New WSM 37cm for 2014

All the latest from barbecue organisations/ organisers and manufactures in the UK, if anything has been missed fell free to chip in!
User avatar
Toby
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1054
Joined: 18 Jan 2012, 15:28
First Name: Toby Shea
Location: Surrey, UK
Contact:

Re: New WSM 37cm for 2014

Post by Toby »

Dan, are you aware that pro q make / used to make them? I think they retailed for about 70 and could turn you kettle into a slightly shorter wsm'

On my phone so can't properly search but here is one link I found
http://www.stifflerssurplus.com/p-5313- ... n-box.aspx
User avatar
Simple-BBQ
Got Wood!
Got Wood!
Posts: 71
Joined: 30 Sep 2013, 20:39
First Name: Dan Eames
Location: 'ampshire
Contact:

Re: New WSM 37cm for 2014

Post by Simple-BBQ »

Toby,

Thanks for the link, not always easy on a 'phone I appreciate. I did come across those when I was trying to find something to buy, rather than finding I needed to make one. I couldn't find anything to fit the standard 22.5" kettle which I have been using for years. These ProQ stackers are for 18.5" barbecues.

We don't have a big garden and when I floated the idea of the addition of a WSM I found myself staring into an abyss :o . Necessity being the mother of invention and here we are both happy.

Dan
maz
Still Raw Inside
Still Raw Inside
Posts: 3
Joined: 05 Apr 2014, 19:59
First Name: Maz
Sense of Humor: Most things! life is taken far too seriously, I try to find the fun in most things :)
Location: Southampton, England

Re: New WSM 37cm for 2014

Post by maz »

Simple-BBQ wrote:I'm not sure I can resist this opportunity for a blatant plug. You could buy a 37cm WSM and not fit much in it. Or, you could buy a Barbecue Stacker (http://www.barbecuestacker.com) and use that with the 57cm Weber kettle you already own and still have change to buy a multipack of beers and a chicken. One beer for the chicken and the rest to enjoy whilst feeling slightly smug?


I'm just trying to decide on wether to get this one or go for the bigger one? How much do you think could feasibly be cooked on the little one? Or should I just go for the 47? I think the 57 would be more than I really need....
:?:
Post Reply