slow n low Vs tin foil?

A place to discuss low 'n' slow cooking, ask questions and share advice.
bedford banger
Got Wood!
Got Wood!
Posts: 18
Joined: 15 May 2012, 15:02
First Name: james

slow n low Vs tin foil?

Post by bedford banger »

what's the difference between slow n low and wrapped up in tin foil? I've just done my 1st ribs wrapped up in a few layers of tin foil and it only took an hour and a half Vs 4-5 hours.

Jim
Swindon_Ed
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1265
Joined: 14 Aug 2010, 18:48
First Name: Ed Gash
Location: Swindon
Contact:

Re: slow n low Vs tin foil?

Post by Swindon_Ed »

Are you cooking them wrapped in foil from the start or wrapping in foil part way through the cook?
User avatar
keith157
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3816
Joined: 05 Aug 2011, 13:35
First Name: Keith
Location: Stevenage, Herts

Re: slow n low Vs tin foil?

Post by keith157 »

Low and slow will give you a smokey taste, then foil to keep the cooking going which enhances the moisture content, then foil off to glaze with a sauce if using one. Traditionally it's 3-2-1
bedford banger
Got Wood!
Got Wood!
Posts: 18
Joined: 15 May 2012, 15:02
First Name: james

Re: slow n low Vs tin foil?

Post by bedford banger »

started off with it in foil for an hour and a quater, rested it and then put it over direct to finish it off.

Jim
User avatar
keith157
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3816
Joined: 05 Aug 2011, 13:35
First Name: Keith
Location: Stevenage, Herts

Re: slow n low Vs tin foil?

Post by keith157 »

If you had wood on the bbq I mean ( :oops: ) to give you smoke then the meat absorbs the smoke best when nthe pores are open during the early part of the cooking process. by foiling it at the start you are stopping that process. Also, depending on your temperature one and a quarter hours isn't that long. Try the 3-2-1 method or 2-2-1 (which I prefer) but start off without foil it will give you a better flavour. :)
Swindon_Ed
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1265
Joined: 14 Aug 2010, 18:48
First Name: Ed Gash
Location: Swindon
Contact:

Re: slow n low Vs tin foil?

Post by Swindon_Ed »

Starting off without foil will also allow you to create a bark on your meat where as foiling straight away won't allow the rub or marinade to attach to the meat.
The Social Smokers
Got Wood!
Got Wood!
Posts: 129
Joined: 02 Nov 2011, 12:41
First Name: Matt
Location: Bristol, UK

Re: slow n low Vs tin foil?

Post by The Social Smokers »

You want to start of not in foil and hitting them with a nice amount of smoke. Then wrap them after an hour or so.
bedford banger
Got Wood!
Got Wood!
Posts: 18
Joined: 15 May 2012, 15:02
First Name: james

Re: slow n low Vs tin foil?

Post by bedford banger »

so would i want to start of on indirect with the wood chips for an hour and then foil it for half and then finish over direct while putting the sauce on?
sorry for all the questions but its the 1st time i've tried ribs :shock:
Swindon_Ed
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1265
Joined: 14 Aug 2010, 18:48
First Name: Ed Gash
Location: Swindon
Contact:

Re: slow n low Vs tin foil?

Post by Swindon_Ed »

Personally i would cook in direct for the first 2-3 hours and use 2 handfuls of soaked wood chips then foil for another 1 & 1/2 hrs & then take out the foil and add you glaze and place back on the bbq to set for 10 minutes
User avatar
KamadoSimon
Rubbed and Ready
Rubbed and Ready
Posts: 527
Joined: 25 Mar 2012, 14:00
First Name: Simon Godfrey
Location: Berkshire

Re: slow n low Vs tin foil?

Post by KamadoSimon »

For ribs, most will do them indirect for the full cook.
Post Reply