You're talking my language, Keith.keith157 wrote:I prefer the concept of low n slow BBQ both for the theatre, taste and the community around it.
For me, the biggest issue with low & slow is that so much of it is barbecuing with a lid on (or in the smoker) and that's quite contrary to the general 'theatre' of barbecuing. If you have a barbecue at say 3:00 in the afternoon, you're cooking from the morning onwards - keep the lid on as much as possible - probably no one around for much of the time.
I don't mind this at all,it's just that the barbecue theatre that people experience when they arrive will be the burgers, etc, later on. No one comes to a barbecue to see a lid - let's face it, they want some sort of open fire.
But of course, you're spot on, it's then the taste. Well, taste and texture. And some of that you can only get from low & slow.
And that's the problem. How do you give them great tasting low & slow cooking along with the theatre of an open fire. I think the only way to do it is to serve a variety of foods. Some pork ribs or butt, but some burgers and chicken, too.
I have a pork shoulder in the freezer. I'll maybe give it a crack with the liquid smoke over half term.
Steve W

